Exclusive | In-Depth Look into Upbit's U.S. Listing: South Korea's Largest Cryptocurrency Exchange More Profitable than Coinbase, Yet Valued at Only 1/7
Original Article Title: "Exclusive | In-depth Look at Upbit's Listing in the US: South Korea's Largest Crypto Exchange More Profitable Than Coinbase, But Valued at Only 1/7"
Original Article Author: Lin Wan Wan, Dose of Beating
On November 27, 2025, a "small earthquake" occurred in the South Korean cryptocurrency community.
Upbit, as the absolute dominant player in the Korean market, fell victim to a hack, with 54 billion Korean won (approximately $36 million) disappearing into thin air. Later, Upbit revised the amount to 44.5 billion Korean won of lost Solana network assets.
However, the market's panic was quickly absorbed.
Because based on Upbit's quarterly net profit of about $200 million, Upbit would only need 2 weeks to earn back the stolen amount.
Just three days before the theft, Upbit's parent company Dunamu announced a "century-old marriage" with South Korea's internet giant Naver Financial, preparing for an IPO on the US stock market, with a current valuation of $10.3 billion.
Behind this merger lies not only South Korea's old and new conglomerates but also a Korean super financial group heading to the US stock market.
In this world, many seemingly isolated "black swan" events, when connected, often turn out to be just a speck of dust falling from a massive "grey rhino."
Theft and Merger
First, we must categorize the nature of this "theft."
$36 million is a significant amount. But in front of a trading platform, we must learn to do the math.
According to Dunamu, Upbit's parent company, the 2024 financial report presented at the annual shareholders' meeting: annual operating profit of 1.18 trillion Korean won (approximately $8-9 billion), net profit of 983.8 billion Korean won (approximately $700 million), a year-on-year increase of 22.2%.
Evidently, this stolen amount is merely a mosquito bite to its massive balance sheet.
Currently, the South Korean Financial Supervisory Service has tentatively identified the clandestine hand behind the scenes as the North Korean Lazarus Group. Official analysis indicates that this attack replicated the "permission hijacking" technique from 6 years ago, where hackers likely stole or impersonated an administrator's account to transfer funds, rather than directly infiltrating servers. Currently, South Korean regulatory authorities have urgently dispatched to Upbit's headquarters for an on-site investigation.
But it was this particular bite from a mosquito that exposed a deeper issue: Upbit has become too big. So big that its cash flow is enough to entice hackers, and its sheer existence is enough to make regulatory authorities wary.
This is why the "century merger" three days ago was so crucial. If the theft showed Upbit's financial strength, then the merger revealed its anxiety and ambition.
According to public information, Naver Financial (Naver's financial branch) will engage in a full equity swap with Dunamu (Upbit's parent company).
Here is an extremely counterintuitive data point. In terms of operating profit, Upbit is at 1.18 trillion Korean won; Naver Financial is only at 103.5 billion Korean won.
This means that Upbit is making 10 times the amount of money compared to the other party.

With such a stark difference in profitability, why merge?
In theory, this should have been an "upward attack" or "takeover" by Upbit on Naver Financial. However, in the world of capital, logic has never been about who has more money being the boss.
Therefore, this merger is more about cooperation between South Korean political interest groups. Upbit, representing the internet and emerging industry "new political power faction" behind Naver, has extended an olive branch to gain Naver's strong political protection. Only through this kind of structural reorganization, leveraging Naver's shell, or using Naver's endorsement, can they bypass South Korean regulations and go straight to the U.S. Nasdaq.
For more details on Upbit's listing, we exclusively interviewed Jason Huang, Founder of NDV USD Fund, an investor with a long-term focus and systematic research on the South Korean cryptocurrency trading ecosystem.
NDV is a compliance-oriented hedge fund focused on "digital asset stocks + derivatives", known for its stringent risk control with independent custody and auditing. In terms of past performance, NDV's first fund, Fund I, has had outstanding performance, achieving a 275.5% net settlement return within two years.
Below is our interview.
Interview on Upbit Listing
The Probe: What is Upbit expected to achieve through a U.S. listing?
Jason: Currently, the merger between Upbit's parent company Dunamu and Naver Financial may be the largest in Crypto history.
After the merger, following the typical preparation period for US stocks, it is expected to take 8-9 months. If all goes smoothly, ideally, the company is expected to file for listing in the second half of 2026.
From what I understand, the world's largest top-tier investment banks are competing to be their underwriters, as it is also one of the best-performing projects. For example, Kraken only turned a profit in the third quarter of this year and has already reached a valuation of $200 billion.
Dongzuo: How is Upbit's compliance and listing preparation?
Jason: Upbit is a very mature and transparent company, essentially equivalent to a "pre-listed company." It is currently audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Korea and is one of the five compliant exchanges in Korea. Therefore, the level of compliance is similar to that of Coinbase in its early years.
The company has no preferred shares, only common stock, and its information disclosure is transparent. The listing preparation work has been basically completed, and after the merger, it is only waiting for regulatory approval.
Dongzuo: Upbit is currently valued at $10.3 billion. How do you view this valuation?
Jason: This is clearly a project with a significant discount in the primary market.
Comparing it to the US exchange platform Coinbase, which currently has a market capitalization of around $70 billion and a Price-to-Earnings ratio (PE) of about 30-40 times, Robinhood's PE ratio even reaches 60-70 times.
In contrast, Upbit's valuation in the primary market is only about $10 billion. Even considering the "Korean discount," Upbit remains a very attractive value proposition. Top investment bank bankers believe this is a multi-billion dollar opportunity.
The so-called "Korean discount" has long existed in the Korean stock market. This is due to factors such as geopolitical risks and the chaebol governance structure, leading to Korean companies generally having lower valuations than similar companies globally.
However, if Upbit were just a profitable trading platform, its upside would only be the next Coinbase. But what is truly more valuable is the just completed acquisition.
The parent company of Upbit, Dunamu, exchanged shares with Naver Financial at a ratio of approximately 1:2.5. If we consider market capitalization: Dunamu, the parent company of Upbit, holds a share of 3, and Naver Financial holds a share of 1. After the merger, the CEO of Upbit's parent company remains the new single largest shareholder.
Insight: What does this merger with Naver Financial signify?
Jason: Let's use an analogy.
What is Naver? It is Korea's Google plus Amazon.
What is Naver Financial? It is Korea's "Alipay" or "Google Pay".
Therefore, this merger will create an unprecedented financial giant. We can think of it as a triad of "Coinbase (exchange) + Google Pay (payment) + Circle (stablecoin)."
Insight: Why mention Circle?
Because the new South Korean government is vigorously promoting a Korean won stablecoin. Referring to Circle's annual substantial revenue payment to Coinbase as a "protection fee" business model, this process will definitely involve Upbit.
Currently, there is no company in the market that can simultaneously possess both a "traditional payment license" and a "cryptocurrency exchange license," and both are national-level applications. The valuation logic of this ecological closed loop is no longer just a simple PE multiple; it is the multiplier effect of platform economics, and it is a good business.
If Coinbase is considered a "trading platform + stablecoin partnership" and Robinhood is a "broker + crypto on-ramp," then in the future, if Upbit completes the merger and issues a Korean won stablecoin, it will look more like a "payment infrastructure + trading platform + native stablecoin" ecosystem.
This is also why current investors believe that the $10.3 billion valuation is a "bargain."

Insight: You mentioned Coinbase earlier. Will Upbit have lower operational costs than Coinbase?
Jason: Yes, Upbit's operating cost is only one-tenth of Coinbase's.
Interviewer: Why is there such a significant cost difference?
Jason: Coinbase operates in the United States and competes globally with Robinhood, Binance, and Kraken. Therefore, it incurs high U.S. labor and compliance costs and is still burning cash to compete.
On the other hand, Upbit operates in the Korean market where competition has basically been eliminated. As the holder of the world's second-largest spot trading volume, second only to Binance, Upbit enjoys an absolute monopoly position.
In economics, this is called the "rent in excess of a natural monopoly," where nearly every additional unit of revenue can be directly converted into net profit.
This has created a significant "valuation gap": a giant with a profit margin far exceeding Coinbase, holding a monopoly position, yet its valuation is only one-seventh of Coinbase's.
For capital, this obvious value mismatch is an enticing target. They are betting on one thing: by listing in the U.S., they can fill this huge valuation gap.
Coinbase faces global competition in the U.S. market and needs to deal with ongoing competition from Kraken, Robinhood, and other rivals. In contrast, the Korean market's competition has been mostly eliminated, and Upbit's monopoly position allows it to more efficiently convert every additional unit of revenue into profit.
Interviewer: If Upbit's valuation is so undervalued, why would anyone want to sell their first-tier equity?
Jason: Some Koreans believe that they cannot fully control the entire listing cycle and are worried that the listing may occur during a bear market. Some people hope to cash out at the current stage.
Personally, even in a bear market, a valuation of $10.3 billion still offers a strong cost-performance ratio.
Interviewer: Many media outlets have reported that Masayoshi Son also played a role in this acquisition?
Jason: That's inaccurate. Masayoshi Son only holds shares in Naver's parent company, and in this merger of its subsidiary Naver Financial, Masayoshi Son is not considered involved. It's like the recent reports of Jack Ma buying Ethereum, which is not true; he is just a shareholder, and Jack Ma may not even know that he has bought Ethereum. Similarly, Masayoshi Son probably doesn't even know that he drove their largest acquisition in South Korea, haha.
Wrap-up: Lastly, let's discuss your view on the cryptocurrency market. How do you see the macro market environment for next year?
Jason: We are optimistic about next year. We were interviewed a few months ago and predicted a 30%-50% pullback within six months, which has now essentially occurred. Retail investors who needed to exit have already done so, and leverage has been largely cleared.
As long as the U.S. is in a rate-cutting environment next year, risk assets are unlikely to decline, and the market is poised for a good performance.
Epilogue
Back to the beginning.
While ordinary retail investors are still lamenting the loss of $35 million in the Upbit incident, true investors are calculating stock-for-stock ratios and planning the Nasdaq bell-ringing ceremony.
This is a power transition in Korean business history.
With the merger with Naver, Upbit is demonstrating this governance structure upgrade. The future Upbit will no longer be just a place for trading coins but a comprehensive fintech group integrating payment, trading, and stablecoins.
This is not a power play of who controls whom but a strategic choice to adapt to the global wave of cryptocurrency regulation.
Upbit is becoming a typical example of a non-U.S. cryptocurrency industry: cryptocurrency exchanges from various countries are all headed in the same direction, from the gray area to the beginning of political cooperation.
You may also like

Meet the new WEEX trial fund—your gateway to greater profits

WEEX Labs Lands at Dutch Blockchain Week: A Disruptive Crypto × AI Conversation Sets Sail in Amsterdam

SK Hynix Reportedly Plans U.S. ADR Listing as Early as August, With SEC Approval Possible in Late June
SK Hynix may pursue a U.S. ADR listing as early as August, with SEC approval reportedly possible in late June amid strong AI chip supply chain demand.

SpaceX vs Tesla vs xAI: Which Elon Musk Trade Has the Biggest Upside in 2026?

OpenAI Reveals It Has Confidentially Submitted an S-1 to the SEC, Keeping the Door Open for a Future IPO
On June 9, according to an OpenAI announcement, the company recently confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), beginning the preliminary compliance process for a potential initial public offering. OpenAI said it chose to disclose this proactively because it expected the news might leak; however, the company has not yet set a specific listing timeline, and related arrangements may still take some time.

Latest research from 13 top universities including Cornell University: The current state, challenges, and misconceptions of the fusion of Crypto and AI

Deconstructing Anthropic: The Best AI Company, Possibly Also a Type of Organizational Invention

Apollo and Blackstone Reportedly Back $35 Billion Anthropic Chip Financing as Deal Details Remain Unclear
On June 9, according to currently available news alerts, Apollo and Blackstone Group participated in a $35 billion financing for an Anthropic “chip project.” Based on the original wording of the report, the funding has already been raised, but public information remains limited. The financing structure, use of proceeds, project entity, and whether Apollo and Blackstone participated through equity, debt, or project financing have not yet been disclosed.

Humanity Protocol Security Incident Escalates: More Than $31 Million Stolen From Related Addresses as Attacker Continues Selling H for ETH
On June 9, according to monitoring by Onchain Lens, more than $31 million has been stolen from addresses linked to Humanity Protocol, and the attack is still ongoing, with the hacker continuously swapping H tokens for ETH. Project founder Terence Kwok later confirmed the security incident on X, saying the issue involved a private key leak.

Bloomberg: As Bitcoin Weakens, Stablecoins and RWA Continue to Drive Expansion in Crypto Businesses
In June, Bloomberg reported that despite Bitcoin falling below $60,000 last week, wiping out about $235 billion in market value within seven days, and dropping close to 50% from last year’s peak, some core businesses in the crypto industry are still expanding, mainly in stablecoins, real-world asset tokenization (RWA), payments, and infrastructure. The report also noted that overall altcoin activity has contracted significantly: altcoin market capitalization has fallen from a peak of about $431 billion in November 2021 to around $170 billion, and among the tens of millions of tokens issued in recent years, fewer than 1,700 still maintain meaningful trading activity.

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

Binance Research: RWA Market Expected to Expand Nearly 6x from Early 2025, with Public Equities and Onchain Payments Heating Up Together
In June, Binance Research said in its monthly market report that the real-world asset (RWA) market is expected to grow by about 589% from the beginning of 2025. Bond- and money market fund-related RWA expanded by about $6.5 billion, up 83% year over year, while publicly traded equity RWAs grew by about 422%. The report also noted that monthly crypto debit card transaction volume exceeded $747 million in May, up 48.6% year to date.

Japan to Assess a Framework for Yen Stablecoins and Crypto ETFs as Asia’s Compliant Payments Narrative Heats Up
Recently, according to the original report, Japan is considering the launch of yen stablecoins and cryptocurrency ETFs. Public information remains limited at this stage, and there is still no complete policy text, regulatory draft, or clear implementation timeline, so this is better characterized as a “policy discussion” rather than formal implementation. The original wording also noted that advancing stablecoin regulation in Asia is driving XRP usage and supporting growth in the XRPL ecosystem. However, based on currently available public information, there is not enough evidence to directly establish a clear causal relationship between this round of discussion in Japan and XRP or XRPL.

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
Meet the new WEEX trial fund—your gateway to greater profits
WEEX Labs Lands at Dutch Blockchain Week: A Disruptive Crypto × AI Conversation Sets Sail in Amsterdam
SK Hynix Reportedly Plans U.S. ADR Listing as Early as August, With SEC Approval Possible in Late June
SK Hynix may pursue a U.S. ADR listing as early as August, with SEC approval reportedly possible in late June amid strong AI chip supply chain demand.
SpaceX vs Tesla vs xAI: Which Elon Musk Trade Has the Biggest Upside in 2026?
OpenAI Reveals It Has Confidentially Submitted an S-1 to the SEC, Keeping the Door Open for a Future IPO
On June 9, according to an OpenAI announcement, the company recently confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), beginning the preliminary compliance process for a potential initial public offering. OpenAI said it chose to disclose this proactively because it expected the news might leak; however, the company has not yet set a specific listing timeline, and related arrangements may still take some time.




